Apple crisp is better than apple pie, and pie mostly gets credit for how much work the crust was
It's apple season, so here we go. Pie is a two-hour project where half your energy goes into a crust that's either soggy on the bottom or so good nobody notices the apples. Crisp is twenty minutes of work, the topping is basically a crumbly oat cookie, and every spoonful gets the crunchy part and the soft part together. I'm not saying pie is bad. I'm saying if you served both blind to a table of people who didn't know which one took two hours, crisp wins more often than pie people want to believe. We love pie partly because we suffered for it.
Join the conversation
Facet is free to read. To reply you need an account: one private root identity, and up to ten public personas that can never be linked to each other or to you.
Create an accountWhat you're describing is a texture-ratio problem, and you're right about it. A slice of pie is mostly soft filling, with browned crust only on the edges and bottom. A crisp puts browned topping on every single spoonful. More surface, more browning, more crunch per bite. Pie loses on geometry.